With Mesa 20.1-devel RADV+ACO and NVIDIA 440.64, no issues were encountered during our X-Plane benchmarking. On the NVIDIA side was the 440.64 driver. The difference was incredible otherwise X-Plane 11.50 beta was loading very slow with RADV. The ACO compiler back-end yielded dramatically lower load times compared to the default AMDGPU LLVM code-path. If you really want to enjoy X-Plane 11 at a higher level of gameplay smoothness, your system must run at with a CPU at least as good as Intel Core i5 6600K at 3.5 ghz or faster, more than 16 GB RAM, a GPU that performs better than DirectX 12-capable video card from NVIDIA or AMD w/4 GB VRAM, while the PC system is running on Windows 7, 8.1, or. With this Radeon RADV Vulkan driver testing, worth noting is that RADV+ACO was used. Ubuntu 20.04 in its near final state was used while for the Radeon graphics the default Linux 5.4 kernel was used paired with Mesa 20.1-devel from the Oibaf PPA. Vulkan rendering performance for this realistic flight simulator. Since then we've been busy benchmarking with 23 different graphics cards of AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce line-ups while running Ubuntu Linux and comparing the OpenGL vs. Gigabyte RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC Pro FPS Test in X-Plane 11 FPS Test at 4K Resolution in X Plane 11 4. Zotac GeForce 1660 Super Dual Fan FPS Test at 1080p Resolution in X-Plane 11 3. Your next upgrade (like mine) should eventually be a better video card.Last week the X-Plane 11.50 beta was released with its long awaited Vulkan renderer to complement its mature OpenGL rendering code. MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X FPS Test at 1080p Resolution in X-Plane 11 2. But otherwise you should be fine with 16 GB RAM. I'm using 32 GB of system RAM which is a nice cushion for multitasking (Web browsing in Chrome during cruise, etc) and it's what you might want if you use the UHD terrain mesh. My settings with the GTX 970 and my 1920x1200 monitor: It only goes much lower (but still above 25 fps) if the ActiveSkyX plugin is injecting multiple cloud layers. That's the video card I'm using (see full specs below), and I get an average 30-45 fps on my 1920x1200 monitor over most scenery in XP11.
That said, the GTX 970 can work okay in XP11 if you don't use a high monitor resolution, and don't go nuts with the slider settings. It's a weird design where the last 0.5 of VRAM is slower, and most flight sims and games won't touch that last 0.5 GB of VRAM in that card.
What monitor resolution are you using? That will be the major limiting factor with your current video card. And by the way, the GTX 970 only has 3.5 GB of usable VRAM in X-Plane.
0 kommentar(er)
